We’ve had easy wins in the US. So why is it more difficult in Australia and New Zealand?

In a recent conversation, a US-based biopharma leader told us: “We’ve cleared the FDA, we’ve got strong adoption in major hospitals, and CMS came through quickly. Why are Australia and New Zealand so much slower?” It’s a fair question that reflects a common misconception. The Australian and New Zealand systems do not mirror the US. Treating Australia as the 51st state is a sure path to frustration.

A different policy environment

In the US, reimbursement can often be driven by large payors, hospital systems, and commercial negotiations. In Australia and New Zealand, the government plays a far more central role. Funding decisions are largely controlled by public bodies, committees, and ministers, each working within strict budgetary limits. Even therapies with strong clinical evidence can wait years if there is no political or social urgency.

Why global playbooks don’t translate

Strategies that work in the US often rely on scale, speed, and market competition. But in Australia and New Zealand, the decision-making culture is different. Policymakers expect local evidence, local patient stories, and clear demonstrations of national benefit. A therapy proven overseas is not automatically viewed as a priority here.

Here are some wise words from our Director, John Emmerson:

“They’re independent, not unaware. If the right MPs are informed and the political lens is applied, they move. Without that, it can stall indefinitely.”

In other words, independence does not mean isolation. Pressure from parliamentarians and patient groups creates accountability for progress.

Making it local

What shifts the needle is localisation. That means:

  • Bringing MPs and ministers into hospitals and clinics to see the therapy in action.
  • Sharing the experiences of Australian or New Zealand patients whose lives are affected by delay.
  • Demonstrating the economic impact in terms of local productivity and healthcare costs avoided.

When decision-makers can connect the therapy to their own constituencies, it stops being an abstract global innovation and becomes a national priority.

How London Agency helps

We often guide international companies through this process. That includes translating global data into Australian and New Zealand contexts, introducing policymakers to clinicians and patients who can tell authentic local stories, and ensuring therapies are positioned in line with current health and economic priorities.

The result is that instead of waiting for global reputation to open doors, therapies earn attention through relevance and resonance in these unique markets.

If you’d like to discuss how to remove barriers and accelerate adoption in Australia and New Zealand, Let’s chat about our Policy Pathway Workshop.